| Ticket UUID: | 794741 | |||
| Title: | sampleextension stublib ranlib fix | |||
| Type: | Patch | Version: | None | |
| Submitter: | nobody | Created on: | 2003-08-25 14:59:19 | |
| Subsystem: | 70. Sample Extension | Assigned To: | das | |
| Priority: | 5 Medium | Severity: | ||
| Status: | Deleted | Last Modified: | 2005-02-04 19:32:27 | |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Closed By: | das | |
| Closed on: | 2005-02-04 12:32:27 | |||
| Description: |
the attached patch fixes an issue with ranlib not being run on stub libs when building dynamically linked extensions (i.e. with RANLIB=.), this breaks building of interdependent stubified extensions on platforms that need ranlib to be run on static libs prior to linking (such as Mac OS X). Essentially, ranlib calls on always static libs e.g. stub libs need to be separated from ranlib calls on libs that can be either static or dynamic, this is done via the new RANLIB_STUB which is set to the value of RANLIB before RANLIB is reset to . when building a dynamically linked extension. Also added a section to the Makefile illustrating how to build stub libraries to clarify usage of the new RANLIB_STUB. The technique adopted at install time is to run RANLIB_STUB on libraries containing the string "stub" and RANLIB on others. This issue affects a number of TEA extensions using their own stub libs: incrTcl, trf, tkimg, tclxml, tcldom; but should also be fixed in sampleextension so that newly TEAfied extensions won't perpetuate this problem... See the following patches for details on how the abovementioned extensions are affected: http://tcltkaqua.sf.net/8.4.4/patches/incrTcl.diff http://tcltkaqua.sf.net/8.4.4/patches/trf.diff http://tcltkaqua.sf.net/8.4.4/patches/tkimg.diff http://tcltkaqua.sf.net/8.4.4/patches/tclxml.diff http://tcltkaqua.sf.net/8.4.4/patches/tcldom.diff these will be submitted to the respective projects as time permits... | |||
| User Comments: |
das added on 2005-02-04 19:32:27:
Logged In: YES user_id=90580 indeed, very old bug, long since fixed hobbs added on 2005-02-02 07:45:35: Logged In: YES user_id=72656 I believe this is in the sample extension now, correct? das added on 2003-08-25 22:21:22: File Added - 59734: sampleextension.diff das added on 2003-08-25 22:21:21: Logged In: YES user_id=90580 and the patch didn't get attached either... das added on 2003-08-25 22:18:16: Logged In: YES user_id=90580 oops, looks the browser forgot my login cookie... submitted by 'das' | |||
Attachments:
- sampleextension.diff [download] added by das on 2003-08-25 22:21:22. [details]