| Ticket UUID: | 1264637 | |||
| Title: | NO_ERRNO_H | |||
| Type: | Bug | Version: | obsolete: 8.5a4 | |
| Submitter: | dgp | Created on: | 2005-08-20 05:16:54 | |
| Subsystem: | 47. Bytecode Compiler | Assigned To: | dgp | |
| Priority: | 5 Medium | Severity: | ||
| Status: | Closed | Last Modified: | 2005-10-14 01:30:28 | |
| Resolution: | Fixed | Closed By: | dgp | |
| Closed on: | 2005-10-13 18:30:28 | |||
| Description: |
Both tclUnixPort.h and tclWinPort.h unconditionally #include <errno.h>. In the few places where NO_ERRNO_H is tested, there's really no point, because by then we've already included errno.h, or had a compiler failure. Seems all the pretense of honoring NO_ERRNO_H can be abandoned, along with attempts to make use of an internal-to-Tcl errno variable (based in tclExecute.c). | |||
| User Comments: |
dgp added on 2005-10-14 01:30:28:
Logged In: YES user_id=80530 committed to HEAD dgp added on 2005-10-14 01:27:39: File Deleted - 149893: File Added - 152422: 1264637.patch dgp added on 2005-10-14 01:27:38: Logged In: YES user_id=80530 updated patch (post-237 merge) dgp added on 2005-09-21 22:21:23: File Added - 149893: 1264637.patch dgp added on 2005-09-21 22:21:12: Logged In: YES user_id=80530 here's a patch. jenglish added on 2005-09-21 21:10:50: Logged In: YES user_id=68433 > Seems all the pretense of honoring NO_ERRNO_H can be abandoned, That would be safe to do. > along with attempts to make use of an internal-to-Tcl errno variable That would be a very good idea. | |||
Attachments:
- 1264637.patch [download] added by dgp on 2005-10-14 01:27:38. [details]