Attachment "leakunload.txt" to
ticket [1710710fff]
added by
kennykb
2007-05-02 00:00:59.
==28619== 26 (24 direct, 2 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 663 of 1,896
==28619== at 0x401A846: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
==28619== by 0x404001D: TclpAlloc (tclAlloc.c:710)
==28619== by 0x404A5C1: Tcl_Alloc (tclCkalloc.c:1019)
==28619== by 0x40ED27E: Tcl_NewStringObj (tclStringObj.c:210)
==28619== by 0x40FF258: Tcl_SetVar2 (tclVar.c:1393)
==28619== by 0x40FF230: Tcl_SetVar (tclVar.c:1341)
==28619== by 0x4136D8C: ???
==28619== by 0x40CBEC5: Tcl_UnloadObjCmd (tclLoad.c:741)
==28619== by 0x40441E5: TclEvalObjvInternal (tclBasic.c:3617)
==28619== by 0x404516F: TclEvalEx (tclBasic.c:4221)
==28619==
==28619==
==28619== 52 (48 direct, 4 indirect) bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,038 of 1,896
==28619== at 0x401A846: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
==28619== by 0x404001D: TclpAlloc (tclAlloc.c:710)
==28619== by 0x404A5C1: Tcl_Alloc (tclCkalloc.c:1019)
==28619== by 0x40ED27E: Tcl_NewStringObj (tclStringObj.c:210)
==28619== by 0x40FF258: Tcl_SetVar2 (tclVar.c:1393)
==28619== by 0x40FF230: Tcl_SetVar (tclVar.c:1341)
==28619== by 0x4134BD4: ???
==28619== by 0x40CB6BF: Tcl_LoadObjCmd (tclLoad.c:432)
==28619== by 0x40441E5: TclEvalObjvInternal (tclBasic.c:3617)
==28619== by 0x404516F: TclEvalEx (tclBasic.c:4221)
==28619==
==28619==
==28619== 52 (48 direct, 4 indirect) bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,039 of 1,896
==28619== at 0x401A846: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
==28619== by 0x404001D: TclpAlloc (tclAlloc.c:710)
==28619== by 0x404A5C1: Tcl_Alloc (tclCkalloc.c:1019)
==28619== by 0x40ED27E: Tcl_NewStringObj (tclStringObj.c:210)
==28619== by 0x40FF258: Tcl_SetVar2 (tclVar.c:1393)
==28619== by 0x40FF230: Tcl_SetVar (tclVar.c:1341)
==28619== by 0x4134D5B: ???
==28619== by 0x40CBEC5: Tcl_UnloadObjCmd (tclLoad.c:741)
==28619== by 0x40441E5: TclEvalObjvInternal (tclBasic.c:3617)
==28619== by 0x404516F: TclEvalEx (tclBasic.c:4221)
==28619==
==28619==
==28619== 52 (48 direct, 4 indirect) bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,040 of 1,896
==28619== at 0x401A846: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
==28619== by 0x404001D: TclpAlloc (tclAlloc.c:710)
==28619== by 0x404A5C1: Tcl_Alloc (tclCkalloc.c:1019)
==28619== by 0x40ED27E: Tcl_NewStringObj (tclStringObj.c:210)
==28619== by 0x40FF258: Tcl_SetVar2 (tclVar.c:1393)
==28619== by 0x40FF230: Tcl_SetVar (tclVar.c:1341)
==28619== by 0x4134D8C: ???
==28619== by 0x40CBEC5: Tcl_UnloadObjCmd (tclLoad.c:741)
==28619== by 0x40441E5: TclEvalObjvInternal (tclBasic.c:3617)
==28619== by 0x404516F: TclEvalEx (tclBasic.c:4221)
==28619==
==28619==
==28619== 52 (48 direct, 4 indirect) bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,041 of 1,896
==28619== at 0x401A846: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
==28619== by 0x404001D: TclpAlloc (tclAlloc.c:710)
==28619== by 0x404A5C1: Tcl_Alloc (tclCkalloc.c:1019)
==28619== by 0x40ED27E: Tcl_NewStringObj (tclStringObj.c:210)
==28619== by 0x40FF258: Tcl_SetVar2 (tclVar.c:1393)
==28619== by 0x40FF230: Tcl_SetVar (tclVar.c:1341)
==28619== by 0x4136D8C: ???
==28619== by 0x4136DBF: ???
==28619== by 0x40CBEC5: Tcl_UnloadObjCmd (tclLoad.c:741)
==28619== by 0x40441E5: TclEvalObjvInternal (tclBasic.c:3617)
==28619==
==28619==
==28619== 52 (48 direct, 4 indirect) bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,042 of 1,896
==28619== at 0x401A846: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
==28619== by 0x404001D: TclpAlloc (tclAlloc.c:710)
==28619== by 0x404A5C1: Tcl_Alloc (tclCkalloc.c:1019)
==28619== by 0x40ED27E: Tcl_NewStringObj (tclStringObj.c:210)
==28619== by 0x40FF258: Tcl_SetVar2 (tclVar.c:1393)
==28619== by 0x40FF230: Tcl_SetVar (tclVar.c:1341)
==28619== by 0x4136BD4: ???
==28619== by 0x40CB6BF: Tcl_LoadObjCmd (tclLoad.c:432)
==28619== by 0x40441E5: TclEvalObjvInternal (tclBasic.c:3617)
==28619== by 0x404516F: TclEvalEx (tclBasic.c:4221)
==28619==
==28619==
==28619== 52 (48 direct, 4 indirect) bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,043 of 1,896
==28619== at 0x401A846: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
==28619== by 0x404001D: TclpAlloc (tclAlloc.c:710)
==28619== by 0x404A5C1: Tcl_Alloc (tclCkalloc.c:1019)
==28619== by 0x40ED27E: Tcl_NewStringObj (tclStringObj.c:210)
==28619== by 0x40FF258: Tcl_SetVar2 (tclVar.c:1393)
==28619== by 0x40FF230: Tcl_SetVar (tclVar.c:1341)
==28619== by 0x4136D5B: ???
==28619== by 0x40CBEC5: Tcl_UnloadObjCmd (tclLoad.c:741)
==28619== by 0x40441E5: TclEvalObjvInternal (tclBasic.c:3617)
==28619== by 0x404516F: TclEvalEx (tclBasic.c:4221)
==28619==
==28619==
==28619== 78 (72 direct, 6 indirect) bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,292 of 1,896
==28619== at 0x401A846: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
==28619== by 0x404001D: TclpAlloc (tclAlloc.c:710)
==28619== by 0x404A5C1: Tcl_Alloc (tclCkalloc.c:1019)
==28619== by 0x40ED27E: Tcl_NewStringObj (tclStringObj.c:210)
==28619== by 0x40FF258: Tcl_SetVar2 (tclVar.c:1393)
==28619== by 0x40FF230: Tcl_SetVar (tclVar.c:1341)
==28619== by 0x4136BD4: ???
==28619== by 0x4136C99: ???
==28619== by 0x40CB673: Tcl_LoadObjCmd (tclLoad.c:423)
==28619== by 0x40441E5: TclEvalObjvInternal (tclBasic.c:3617)
==28619==
==28619==
==28619== 78 (72 direct, 6 indirect) bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,293 of 1,896
==28619== at 0x401A846: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
==28619== by 0x404001D: TclpAlloc (tclAlloc.c:710)
==28619== by 0x404A5C1: Tcl_Alloc (tclCkalloc.c:1019)
==28619== by 0x40ED27E: Tcl_NewStringObj (tclStringObj.c:210)
==28619== by 0x40FF258: Tcl_SetVar2 (tclVar.c:1393)
==28619== by 0x40FF230: Tcl_SetVar (tclVar.c:1341)
==28619== by 0x4136D5B: ???
==28619== by 0x4136DBF: ???
==28619== by 0x40CBEC5: Tcl_UnloadObjCmd (tclLoad.c:741)
==28619== by 0x40441E5: TclEvalObjvInternal (tclBasic.c:3617)
