Overview
Artifact ID: | 07d61ce8d36c5e76bc3ffb3bde01becfe82176b4 |
---|---|
Ticket: | f214b8ad5b9a92e9476734ade445abf8cdecea21
shutdown woes |
User & Date: | jan.nijtmans 2013-11-08 10:17:00 |
Changes
- icomment:
I agree with this solution. My attempt fixing this (See the [bug-f214b8ad5b] branch) only resulted in some clean-up, but didn't really solve this: probably too dangerous to do such reform in a bug-fix release. The only potential problem I see is possible shimmering when Tcl_Obj's are used in two interpreters. But since the function GetObjectForOption (in tkConfig.c) does a Tcl_NewStringObj(Tk_NameOfFont(tkfont), -1) for Fonts, I think it's OK. So, I'm OK merging this to trunk, and also backporting it. > Should a particular meaning of a font name have control > over just one screen? Or one interp? Or one "application" ? I'm not sure, only that "interp" is not the correct answer. My guess would be "application", as suggested by: [4a168c76f4?ln=18-20]
- login: "jan.nijtmans"
- mimetype: "text/x-fossil-wiki"